![]() |
|||
|
Actuality & Events 4/2011 |
|||
|
SAVE Foundation and SAVE Network
|
|||
|
Home Deutsche
Version |
=> Link
to
the
SAVE eNews
archive
(former editions of
'actuality')
eNews:
Go to:
Agrobiodiversity.Net: The Who's Who of European NGOs The website "European Agrobiodiversity Network" (http://www.agrobiodiversity.net) is five years old (eNews 2/2006). At the beginning, it was questionable if another website was really needed, however, the "European Agrobiodiversity Network" has become an important European platform for agrobiodiversity, especially for non-governmental organisations. Here all the important institutes and organisations working in the field of agrobiodiversity in Europe are brought together as a service from the SAVE Foundation on one website. You also have the possibility to position the details of your national NGO on this website on the national page - with contact address and the weblink. Take the opportunity to send us your up-dated details! ![]() Always up to date with
Agrobiodiversity.Net However, the European Agrobiodiversity network offers much more: The website is divided into the "European Networks", "Regional Networks" and "National Networks". Under "European Networks", European NGO networks, including the different SAVE networks are listed. The list is completed with "GO Networks' where State-level European networks are listed. The "Regional Networks" present the regions where the SAVE Network is active in cross-border: for more information about the regions there is an interactive map. It is also possible to open the menu point Area Networks, where regional activities, networks and results are published. This includes, for example, for the Balkan Region the goals and description of the network, what events (meetings) have taken place, an Atlas of the Rare Breeds of the Balkans (Breed Atlas), a member page, news and links. The "Topic Networks" refer to the two currently active networks for shorthorn cattle and water buffalo. National NGO
Networks And now it is up to YOU: Take advantage of the opportunity to make your (national) organisation known. Send your request for entry to the SAVE Network Office! We will generate any up-dates and new entries as soon as possible. Provide us with a two-line short description of your organisation, as well as contact details and your home page. We will list you in Agrobiodiversity.Net under the respective country. Contact us today at
office@save-foundation.net.
We will process your suggestions and entry wishes as soon as
possible on http://www.agrobiodiversity.net
A statement of Dr. Philip
Sponenberg, The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy A deep understanding of breeds can powerfully inform and shape effective conservation programs at all levels. Knowledge is especially important when resources might not provide for "saving it all," because in that situation wise choices need to be made in order to save as much as possible, and to save it effectively for use by the next generations of farmers and consumers. The most basic definition of a breed that some have adopted for a variety of reasons is that a breed is "anything anyone says it is". This includes a wide variety of populations, and the result does not help much to assess the relative value of populations for biodiversity. The other extreme is only recently made possible by molecular genetics testing. This approach defines breeds by the specific, identifiable genes they contain, focusing on the most common variants as being typical. The definition is "breed = identifiable package of specific genes". This approach assumes that the techniques are capturing most or all of the relevant genetic information. ![]() A useful general definition lies between these extremes: a breed is a group of animals whose individual members resemble each other closely enough to be readily recognized, and that reproduce this same breed type when mated together. This definition assures genetic uniformity within the breed, leading to predictability. It also indicates agreement among breeders about the characteristics defining the breed. This defines a breed as a phenotypically identifiable and somewhat consolidated genetic resource, which helps to determine conservation priorities. This definition is basically "breed = genetic resource", although some will fault it for being driven by appearance and production and not by molecular techniques. However, appearance and production are both driven by genetics, so that uniformity in them indicates underlying genetic uniformity. This definition drove most breed development over the last few centuries. Producers and breeders had a goal, wanted predictability, and mated animals with both goal and predictability in mind. Breeders were isolating genetic pools without understanding the finer points of genetics, and without the ability to measure individual genes. Molecular genetics can now peek into genomes, and the tendency is to replace the older practices of master breeders who used appearance and production. The two approaches can vary in result, although both have a place in breed conservation. Appearance and production are based on the underlying genetics, so that focusing on them rather than on identified genes does not lead to a non-genetically-based strategy. The "breeds as genetic resources" definition can drive conservation decisions in a few ways. One is that it allows decision-makers to focus on the degree to which populations satisfy the definition, leading to a ranking of populations as to the degree of genetic consolidation or uniformity (and therefore predictability) in the candidate population. A second is an evaluation of the relative uniqueness, or lack of relatedness, compared to other populations. "Breed = genetic resource" is a convenient and reasonably objective definition, and allows conservation to encompass anything that leads to saving genetic resources. Cryo-preservation, exhibition/demonstration herds, and production herds all have important roles. A global view of breeds and their role in agriculture needs to encompass factors beyond the strict genetic resource definition. Each breed lives in its own environment, with constraints imposed by the natural environment. Agricultural resources are also affected by selection decisions made by breeders, and by husbandry practices of human owners. The selection pressures of this uniquely agricultural environment determine the ongoing genetic structure of the breed. Without these constraints, breeds will change from their original form. For this reason breeds are most effectively conserved in their original habitat, under their original management, as this allows the breed to slowly adapt to changes in the environment. This is important for long-term survival as environments change. ![]() In this sense, then, the definition becomes "functional breed = genetic resource + natural environment + human management and selection". This takes effective conservation to a very different endpoint, because breed populations must be kept as ongoing genetically viable groups in an appropriate environment, and under appropriate management and selection. This requires living populations of animals in a productive setting. This does not rule out cryopreservation, but does imply that living populations are the ultimate goal and that these need to be carefully maintained and monitored. It is not always possible to "have it all". In some cases saving the genetic resource by cryopreservation may be all that can be done. This strategy removes both "natural environment" and "human management and selection" from the equation. Other situations remove only one or the other of these factors, and can still change the final outcome. For some feral livestock, the component of "natural environment" may be impossible to maintain due to removal or eradication programs, and acknowledging the resulting change in final genetic outcome can be useful in informing conservation programs. For other breeds, the "human management and selection" piece may have to change radically from past practices due to changes in societal demands for animal welfare. In each case the changes can be acknowledged, and can be counteracted by wise decisions in population management and selection that allow the original resource to persist without significant change in overall genetic structure. The short version of all
of this is: See further discussion
approaches:
The SAVE Annual Meeting 2011 took place 22nd - 25th September in Dimitrovgrad, Serbia. This meeting, co-organised by the SAVE network partner Natura Balkanika, was a great opportunity to see the beautiful landscape and interesting culture of the area as well as networking with members and other people committed to the conservation of agrobiodiversity. Even though the meeting required considerable travel for many people, SAVE and Natura Balkanika were happy to welcome 35 participants from 10 countries. The annual meeting, which included meetings of the SAVE bodies as well as a DAGENE meeting was enhanced by the 5th European Seminar on AgroBiodiversity with the topic: "Preservation or Adaptation? - Conservation in the face of a changing environment" (presentations see: http://www.save-foundation.net/Conferences/Dimitrovgrad.htm). The Seminar provided a wide view on various subjects, some practically-based and others gave an in-put on the current scientific knowledge on adaptation. The seminar attracted media attention and a report about it was broadcast on television. Participants confirmed that the agrobiodiversity seminar has become an important part of the annual meeting and that it should be continued. Ten members of the Board of Directors met together in a closed session, with only four of the members not present due to other commitments. ![]() The combined meeting of the Council of Cooperation Partners (i.e. Network members) and the Project Commission was was followed by an open session on Heritaste® (see eNews 3/11). This discussion was a part of the public consultation to finalise the conditions for use of the label and to create a framework within which it should function. It is clear that, although there is a great interest in the label, there are many problems that will need to be ironed out before it can be used. The public consultation remains open until the end of 2011. All the information plus the notes on the discussion in Dimitrovgrad can be found here http://variety-savers.net/page/heritaste-consultation. The SAVE-Network was able to welcome a new member in Serbia. The Serbian Association of Breeders of Old Breeds was accepted into the Network and, through some of the excursions, it was possible to meet members of the Association and to look at some of their animals. This brings the number of Network members to 22 from 15 countries. The Regional Fair of Balkan AgroBiodiversity (Rare Breeds Exhibition) took place on the 23rd September and was visited by the participants of the annual meeting. The fair provided a good opportunity to experience the local culture through music, dance, food and handicrafts. There were also breeds on display and the annual meeting participants were able to ask questions to the breeders. The fair is a good example of how rare breeds and traditional culture can be made attractive. An adventurous trek in the Stara Planina Nature Park provided a good opportunity for getting to know other participants and to share information and ideas. Often, the annual meeting is dominated by meetings and, whilst it is essential that these meetings take place, it was clear that everyone enjoyed the chance of seeing new surroundings and having time to get to know each other better. One further excursion took place to the meadows of the Milina farm near Dimitrovgrad to see the grazing animals. The whole of the annual meeting was enriched by the chance to try the traditional food of the region and participants were entertained by a traditional music group in a small, private performance. At the Regional Fair of Balkan AgroBiodiversity the music group was present again, this time in traditional costume. In all, the whole meeting was an enjoyable opportunity to see the work being done for the conservation of agrobiodiversity in this part of Serbia. Thanks to the good organisation by the SAVE partner Natura Balkanika, the whole meeting ran smoothly. SAVE wishes to extend thanks to Natura Balkanika and, in particular to Sergej Ivanov, for the collaboration in organising this meeting.
Arca-Deli® Awards 2011 SAVE Foundation is pleased to announce the winners of the Arca-Deli Awards 2011! The judges agreed that the award is not a competition as such; rather it is an award for innovative and qualitative conservation activities. The awards for 2011 go to the following products and services:
We congratulate all the winners for their excellent products and services and look forward to being able to present more awards in 2012. In case of any questions, please contact SAVE staff on office@save-foundation.net. For more information on the institutions see http://www.arca-net.info respectively http://variety-savers.info.
To help stimulate the international exchange of information between farmers and experts, and of course, to conserve the almost forgotten knowledge about old varieties and genetic diversity for future generations, the Fruit-Net project was called to life a few years ago. Fruit-Net, the Internet database of conservers of rare fruits and berries in Europe now appears in new guise and with a new database system on http://www.fruit-net.info. In this publically available (English) database a variety of search experts and institutions that harbour rare species and varieties (and in some cases offer for sale) can be found through an extensive search function. It is also possible to search by species (varieties). Currently about 450 institutions and experts in Europe are listed. The institutions and experts manage and update the respective contents of the database themselves, using an individual log-in (with password). In spite of an annual call to update, it may be that individual entries are outdated or have misleading content. In such cases, SAVE Foundation asks the users of the database to let us know on: office@save-foundation.net. Messages about other institutions and professionals who are not listed, or could contribute their knowledge of synonyms for fruits in different languages are also welcome. ![]() In the context of updating the Fruit-Net, the "synonym register" was revised. It now has more than 18,000 synonyms for apple and cherry and is now also listing Prunus varieties. The species and varieties and their synonyms can be found using a detailed search function. The synonym register can also be reached directly via: http://www.synonymregister.info.
PAR Researcher
Database Congratulations to Goran
Gugic SAVE Activity Report
2010-2011 Heritaste® ![]() Social media Variety-Savers is the dedicated social network for networking and listing all keepers of in-digenous livestock breeds & cultivators of indigenous cultivated plants found in Europe. If you have not yet joined up, then now is your chance! Go to http://variety-savers.net/.
5-8 December: Regional Workshop for Central and Eastern Europe on Updating National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans; Minsk, Belarus. Web: http://www.cbd.int/ 8 December: ESPON-GEOSPES Conference "Europe's special areas?", Brussels, Belgium. Contact: Diana.borowski@perth.uhi.ac.uk, Web: http://www.geospecs.eu/Registration.html 8-10 December: Young researchers' conference: "Conservation Sciences in the Mediterranean Region", at Tour du Valat, Camargue, France. Web: www.medconservationsciences-conference.org/ ________________________________________________________________ 2012: 17-19 January: Mediterranean Regional Workshop for Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans: Coordinating Local and National Action in the Mediterranean Basin. Montpellier, France. Web: http://www.cbd.int/ 20-29 January: International Green Week, Berlin, Germany. Web: http://www.gruenewoche.de/en 13-14 February: Intern. Conference "Let Good Products Flow!" Global Organic Market Access 2012 and Beyond. Nuremberg, Germany. Web: http://www.goma-organic.org/conference/ 20-22 February: 15th International Conference on Organic Fruit Growing; University Hohenheim, Germany. Contact: jkienzle@ecofruit.net, Web: http://www.ecofruit.net/. 25 February - 4 March: Salon International de l'Agriculture, Paris, France. Web: http://www.salon-agriculture.com/ 5-9 March: ECPGR Malus/Pyrus Meeting, jointly with ad hoc meeting on Fruit synonyms & descriptors; at Weggis, Switzerland. markus.kellerhals@acw.admin.ch 9-11 March: 7th Forum "Let's Liberate Diversity", at Strathpeffer, Scotland. Web: www.liberate-diversity-scotland2012.org 15-16 March: International Conference "Geographical Indications in the European Union - legal framework and protection strategies". Trier, Germany. Web: http://www.era.int 30 March - 1 April: City Farms Annual General Meeting, Pietersheim City Farm in Lanaken, Belgium, Web: http://www.cityfarms.org/ 13 April: NATUR Congress "Landscape in the tension between protection and utilization", Basel, Switzerland. Congress in the frame of the NATUR Fair (13-16 April) "Sustainability Platform". Web: http://www.natur.ch/ 15-17 April: Conference on Sustainable Land Use and Rural Development in Mountain Areas, Stuttgart, Germany. Contact: uplands2012@uni-hohenheim.de, Web: https://uplands2012.uni-hohenheim.de/ 17-18 April: 6th European Organic Congress; Copenhagen, Denmark. Contact: info@ifoam-eu.org 7-9 May: 7th Organic Marketing Forum: "Processing and Marketing Organic Products and Raw Material". Warsaw, Poland. Web: www.organic-marketing-forum.org, Contact: info@ekoconnect.org 21 - 23 May: 2nd Nordic Conference for Rural Research "Rural at the Edge" in Joensuu, Finland. Web: http://www.mua.fi 28 May - 2 June: BALWOIS 2012 International Conference: "Environment and Human Activities", Ohrid, Macedonia (FYROM). Web: http://www.balwois.com/2012/ 6-7 June: Regulatory and Institutional Frameworks for Markets for Ecosystem Services; International Interdisciplinary Conference at Surrey, UK. Web: http://www.ias.surrey.ac.uk/workshops/ecosystem 4-8 July: SEEmore Conference 2012: Mountain Resources and Their Response to Global Change" in Ankara, Turkey. Contact: csaum@ankara.edu.tr, Web: http://csaum.ankara.edu.tr/index_en.php 27-31 August: 63rd EAAP Annual Meeting, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Web: http://www.eaap.org/ 7-10 September: European Federation of City Farms Conference 2012. Lübeck, Germany. Web: http://www.cityfarms.org/ 12-14 September: 2nd IFOAM Animal Husbandry Conference; Hamburg, Germany. Contact: events@ifoam.org, Web: www.ifoam.org/animalhusbandry2012 18-20 September: 25th International Conference "Genetic Days"; Wroclaw, Poland. Web: http://gen.ar.wroc.pl/days/index.htm 27-29 October: Internat. Fruit Exhibition EUROPOM 2012 at Klosterneuburg, Lower Austria. Web: http://www.arge-streuobst.at.
=>
Further information is available
from:
|
||
|
12-01-16 |
|||
|
office(at)save-foundation.net SAVE Network
Office |
|
||